![]() |
| Good for at least an extra 10 km/h |
Tuesday, June 24, 2025
Oops
Friday, December 06, 2013
New Vee video review
Tuesday, December 03, 2013
The new Vee
Tuesday, October 29, 2013
Friday, January 11, 2013
Manned Missle
![]() |
| 2009 GSX-R1000 |
![]() |
| The pointy end (nobody normally gets to see this once the bike is in motion) |
Snicking it into first gear and pulling away I noticed a relatively tall first gear but the bike not only makes around 180hp but also plenty of torque. In town the change from first to second is basically at the speed limit but I discovered that you could also then go up into third and the bike did not mind burbling along with somewhere around 3,000 revs on the dial. Down changes took me a few goes to get the hang of but this was just due to the gear lever position.
Funnily enough, every other vehicle on the road was going far too slow and I definitely had to watch my speed. Any twitch of the throttle and the bike was off - the thing just wants to go! Later on my way back to return the bike I did a brief excursion out onto a short stretch of open road and managed to stretch the bikes legs ever so slightly. Actually, I probably didn't even get into the bike's mid-range as I gave it a squirt in 3rd to get past some cars. Suffice it to say I reached somewhere around the speed limit in a blink of the eye before needing to change gear...Then I settled down for the pootle back through town.
I can't really comment on the handling as riding around town is not going to test the handling of a sports bike. Obviously the narrower bars mean that a bit more rider effort is required but then this is just another thing that makes riding a sports bike rewarding.
So would I ever own one? Well, as much as the engine performance is addictive, the bike just has so much more potential than I'd ever be able to use or in other words more than enough potential to get me into trouble. Perhaps the 600 would be a
Wednesday, October 03, 2012
The new Vee
More pics and information here on Motorcycle.comhttp://www.motorcycle.com/index.html.
So far I like the look - it's still "interesting" like my Vee but it needs a second muffler! It appears to be slightly more road-oriented as seems to be the trend these days - I wonder if there will be a more off-road biased version too?
Good to see that they've fitted better brakes but will the radials be too much off-road? I'd love my Vee to have better brakes on the tar but stay as they are for when I'm off road. One slight touch off-road with radials and you might end up going down in a screaming heap. Perhaps the ABS system has been designed so that it is usable (or has different modes) off road.
Panniers look small and the RHS one is smaller than the LHS (thanks for that idea BMW) but hug the bike a lot better than mine. I guess the serious guys will still opt for the flash aluminium jobbies.
I do not need a new Vee, I do not need a new Vee...
Thursday, July 26, 2012
109 Cubic Inches
![]() |
| Suzuki M109 Boulevard (34 times the capacity of the scooter next to it!) |
The forward foot controls took me a second or two to find (and I have to say I weren't my cup of tea) but I was grinning as soon as I let the clutch out and pottered off up to the traffic lights. The beast was making some fabulous noises under me and I was looking forward to the unfortunately short ride to work.
I never got out of third but with all that torque I was able to trundle along with 2,000rpm or less on the dial (actually an lcd bar graph type rev counter) and simply give the throttle the tiniest nudge to have it pull away. For some strange reason I got quite a buzz out of giving it short squirts and then backing off again, listening to the music the bike made on a closed throttle. I also had the opportunity to nail the bike off the line at a set of lights and yes, my arms are now slightly longer than they were when I got up this morning - talk about fun!
And know we get to the handling. Well, if you want outstanding handling you never buy a cruiser. In saying that, when ridden like a cruiser (I've ridden a couple of others in the past) then there was absolutely no issues. The rider is completely unaware of the 347kg weight once under way, the bike is long and low and feels balanced and planted. When turning, the bike leans over so far quite easily and then gets to a certain point where it feels like that's it, but if you apply some muscle then it eventually comes around to your way of thinking and leans over some more. I have a sneaking feeling that this is more to do with that big fat rear tyre than the lazy cruiser geometry. I never scraped anything on the road but then I wasn't trying that hard. Braking was simply a non issue as Suzuki actually puts brakes on it's bikes and that big donk gives masses of engine braking too.
Heading back into town to pick up the DL I was in a fair bit of traffic so I just pootled along with a handful of revs on the dial but played at being a Harley rider by making sure that I was giving the throttle a decent blip on down changes and even occasionally at the lights to let the cage drivers know I was there and they'd better be careful or they'd be sucked into the air filters on the 109...
But I had to give it back...and I have to say that a certain torquey 1,000cc V-twin did not quite feel quite as torquey as usual - but at least it didn't need any persuasion to go around corners...
I still want a 109 though...
Friday, July 01, 2011
650 V-Strom Test ride
Friday, June 24, 2011
More on the new V-Strom
Wednesday, June 22, 2011
New V-Strom
Thursday, November 18, 2010
Wee-strom 650
Wee-strom info
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
Saturday, November 28, 2009
Taming the Beast
Saturday, November 14, 2009
Saturday, October 31, 2009
Pete's GSX-R For Sale
Monday, September 14, 2009
GSX1250FA
http://www.motorcycle-usa.com/639/4583/Motorcycle-Article/2010-Suzuki-GSX1250FA-and-Bandit-First-Look.aspx
Edit: Found another article with some more info on the GSX1250. More photos of the bike with some showing it fitted with luggage. Very nice.
http://www.twowheelsblog.com/post/2916/2916
Sunday, September 07, 2008
SV1000S VS VTR1000F
Awesome - two weekends in a row I get
to try out different horses and compare them to the might VTR! Dad only picked up his SV on Friday but was quite keen to take it for a run and meet me somewhere so I could have a little squirt.I got on the SV at Porangahau Beach and road it back up Route 52 to Waipuk. This is a primo ride with plenty of nice corners to throw a sportsbike at.
Getting on the SV, I noticed that the ride position is pretty similar to that of the VTR - the bars may be a little bit lower and also feel a little wider. Seat comfort was a much of a muchness and weather protection was also similar - the standard screen of the SV was pretty good compared to the Givi one on the VTR.
Riding off and naturally you know it is V-twin - the same lumpy sort of power delivery although the motor seems to smooth out a bit more than the VTR once there's some revs on. The fuel injection is very smooth and helps the quick response from engine even if in a high gear with not many revs on - to me this felt better than the VTR. Once steaming along the bike feels very relaxed just like the VTR and it is easy to speed - the standard pipes are a bit louder than the VTR's but definitely not noisy. As we were not riding hard and didn't try any top gear roll-on comparisons or anything it's hard to say which bike had more go (although the SV should win here), let's just say that the two twins offer similar performance and it's the kind that puts a big smile on the dial!
It took me quite a while to get used to the steering damper - especially in slower corners. I haven't ridden a bike with one for a long time and you forget that you need to put in a bit more effort to get the bike through the corners. I also felt (again because I'm not used to a damper) that it damped out some of the "feel" from the front wheel. It was good however, in the bumpier corners where the VTR would have been a bit twitchier, the SV held it's line a bit better. Dad had been playing with his suspension settings (softening them up) and it was in these bumpier corners where the bike felt a little soft in the rear. The brakes were fine although I never had to use them hard.
Looks: well, the SV has a more modern look to it and is nice in black but they're pretty similar in that they both have minimal fairing's so that the motor can go on show. The SV is perhaps the more aggressive looking and that probably fits as it is the "sportier" package of the two. Twins are fun!
Sunday, August 31, 2008
GSX-R1100 vs VTR1000F
Okay, so I got to go from my VTR to Murray's GSX-R and back again in one little ride, so what's the difference? What do I think? Well it was a pretty quiet little potter on the GSX-R but it was definitely nice to ride her again.
Firstly the riding position: they are both quite similar in that they have that sport's bike crouch but the on the GSX-R this is more pronounced and your feet are much higher and the bars are a bit lower. To me this makes the VTR just that little more comfortable and the better bike for longer distance rides - not something that either of them are really designed for.
What about the donks? Well, obviously this is where the differ the most. The VTR with it's 110hp V-twin and the GSX-R with it's larger 4 cylinder breathing with the aid of Yoshimura jets & headers and bellowing out of one of Brendon's Pro-muff mufflers - you've gotta be looking at somewhere around 140hp I guess. The GSX-R also makes do with one gear less than the VTR and is designed to be revved a bit more than the twin.
Surprisingly though the GSX-R motor is very well mannered - she didn't feel like she was going to bite even with a few revs on the dial but definitely sounded the part - gotta love that sound especially on more aggressive down changes. Cruising along at about the speed limit the bike also feels like it's going faster than at the same speed on the VTR. I put this down to the more buzzy motor (more explosions happening than on the VTR) and perhaps the difference in rider protection offered by the windshield. Not a bad thing - helps stop the speeding when it's perhaps not the place for it...
Cruising along the GSX-R feels every bit of the extra 30-40kg it has over the VTR but this is not a bad thing. I'm now pretty used to riding heavy beasts and they tend to feel a lot more planted on the road. This extra weight and what is probably better suspension than the VTR would probably make the GSX-R better behaved in bumpy corners and also perhaps a bit safer in the wet. Overall it felt great motoring down the road and was a lot of fun to ride.
Looks? Well, judge for yourself but personally I like the look of both of them but think that the GSX-R is showing it's age very gracefully and is still a great looking bike. I'd also have to say it's a better looking bike than the newer GSX-R1000's and Murray has truly kept this one in as new condition.
So would I have one? Well, if I was a zillionaire with a big shed (or sheds) it'd be great to own a truly classic superbike but I'm not and can only just justify the two I've got now. So if I could have had the VTR or the GSX-R for the same money? A tricky question but I think I would still have taken the VTR. Already having a four in the shed it is really nice to have something else which is totally different and that v-twin just puts a big smile on your dial!
Wednesday, July 30, 2008
Saturday, December 22, 2007
Baby Gixxers
http://www.visordown.com/motorcyclenews/view/industry_eye_two_baby_gsx_rs_in_the_pipeline/2166.html
We've had 18,000rpm 250 4's before but what's the 125 gonna be?




